The American

High-end arms dealers get lonely too
Released:
2010

Director: Anton Corbijn

Starring: George Clooney, Irina Bjorklund, Violante Placido, Paolo Bonacelli

The Setup:

Specialty sniper-weapon artisan finds himself wanting a ladyfriend.

Discussion:

There is a certain type of artsy film that spends long sections just kind of examining things, giving the audience lots of time to fill in those spaces with their own thoughts and reflections. The problem is, this is a very tricky thing to pull off, and if it doesn't work, you end up with a film full of large, empty spaces that only draw attention to how little is actually going on. Which brings us to The American.

This is a sort of art-inflected spy thriller directed by Anton Corbijn, photographer known for his rock star portraits and album covers. We open with George Clooney as Jack [we're never sure of his real name] snug in a cabin in snowy Sweden with some lovely lass. They're going for a walk across the frozen lake when they are targeted by an assassin. Jack's girlfriend in shocked when he whips out a gun, and dispatches the killer. He then tells her to run and call for help, then shoots her in the back of the head! Clooney's face convincingly shows us how torn up he is over this. And... well, that was the best sequence of the film, right there.

Jack shaves his beard [we knew it had to go], goes to Rome, and calls his boss. The Boss [I don't think we ever find out his name] gives him a car and directions to this small Italian town. The Boss implies that Jack was a fool for having a relationship at all, and advises him "Don't make any friends." Jack goes to the recommended town, surveys the place and finds it suspicious, so he tosses the cell phone the Boss gave him and moves to the small town next door.

There he encounters a nosy priest with whom he will form a sort of attachment and have many thematically-related discussions about sin and redemption. His boss arranges a job for him, and he meets the attractive female client it's for. She wants a specialty weapon for assassination. George finds the parts and makes it. Meanwhile he has been sleeping with a particular prostitute, Clara, and starts dating her outside the brothel. When the Swedes try to kill him, Jack realizes that someone is blabbing about his whereabouts.

Meanwhile, we have noticed that there are a great deal of shots from behind Jack's head, showing us what he sees and inviting us to share his head space. Unfortunately there's not too much going on there that is clear to us. There's a thematically-relevant discussion as Jack spies an endangered butterfly [endangered--like himself!] and we realize that he knows all about butterflies--a simple, fragile, beautiful thing in this cruel world--and he just happens to have a stylized butterfly tattooed on his back, causing the ladies in his life to refer to him as "Mister Butterfly."

The movie picks up the pace in the last few minutes, and ends in a fairly satisfying way, although one that will be quite familiar to anyone who has ever seen a crime or gangster movie before. And then you turn to your friend and say “That was pretty good.” And then you go home and think about it. And that’s where the trouble starts.

Because ultimately there just isn’t much going on in its pretty little head. I think this was quite intentional on Corbijn’s part, and while it’s nice that he wanted to create a fairly stately and meditative thriller, there has to be something there to meditate on [and please do not suggest we meditate on the tattered and tired sin and redemption discussions, thanks so much]. There’s a rich tradition of films that leave viewers a lot of space to think about what’s going on—I think the most clear-cut example is how the Director’s Cut of Blade Runner removed all the voice-over and opened up all that space for the viewer to think about the ideas going on. Another current movie that does this is Never Let Me Go. The difference is, those movies have a lot of ideas and concepts happening, which one can reflect on during the slower parts, and start to invest the images and otherwise “blank” spaces with meaning. I would guess that Corbijn WANTS that here—that he intends all the slow sections to be filled in with our thoughts and reflections. But there’s just not enough going on, and what IS going on is all quite familiar from other films. And, based on Corbijn’s background as a photographer, one then begins to make all sorts of unflattering inferences about what he might THINK is deep and how he might THINK these images are quite evocative…

But again, it’s perfectly pleasant as it’s going on, which has its value. And I don’t ask Resident Evil: Afterlife to linger in my consciousness and enlighten me… although I believe this movie aspires to be better regarded. And there are worse things to look at than George Clooney and beautiful women and charming Italian villages. But look at them while you can, because that’s about all this movie has in its bag of tricks.

Should you watch it?

It’s pleasant, just a bit emptier than one would wish.

Comments

All comments must be approved before they are published. Only approved comments will appear. You may also use this space to report typos and broken links.

Reflections...

When I saw this one in the theatre my reaction was pretty much the same as yours: gorgeous pictures, but there didn't seem to be a lot going on underneath.

Then I read an early draft of the script a couple of days ago, and it made me look at the film in an entirely new light. One thing that struck me early on is that the description of Jack when we first see him ends on the line: "Jack is no longer young." Obviously, George Clooney at this point is no spring chicken either, but given the way Hollywood deals with age this didn't really register with me when I was watching the movie. Now however it made me look at the story in a different way: instead of watching it as the story of a criminal who wants out I saw it more as the story of a guy about to reach retirement age.

Suddenly I noticed all these scenes where Jack seems to do non-work related stuff that turns out to be work-related after all. He goes to the market to have a cup of coffee, but it's a meet with his client. He visits the mechanic maybe to satisfy his curiosity about the young man in the photo with the priest, but also to get tools. He finds the secluded lake but uses it as a shooting range. When he takes his client to the lake, he carefully prepares a picnic, but only to deceive potential Carabineri. And so on. The script has another nice sequence early on where Jack is taking pictures all over town, really taking in the architecture, and then we cut to his room where he's laying out the pictures making a map of the town and identifying possible ambush spots. Apart from reading about butterflies - and even then, we don't actually see him reading; we only see him having fallen asleep over the book - Jack on his own doesn't seem to have much of an idea what to do once he's actually out.

In this context, the scenes with the priest also took on a new light. Yes, there are all the thematically relevant discussions on sin and redemption, but beyond that the priest also represents sort of a counter design to Jack's life plan: he enjoys a good meal where Jack is frugal and lean, he somehow managed to have good relations with his son where Jack severs any connection at the first sign of trouble - he's managed to actually live a somewhat satisfying life where Jack doesn't seem to have much beyond his work and fear.

(Also, and I'm kicking myself for not realising this when I first saw the film, apart from the fragile beauty thing butterflies are of course the result of a transformative process much like the one Jack is undergoing. In fact, when Jack first drives into the tunnel in the beginning, this could be seen as the beginning of a transformation - moving through a long dark tunnel into blinding white light - and the movie ends with a butterfly ascending into the sky. I guess that would make the town the coocoon, or purgatory for the theologically inclined.)

Anyway... I'm not sure if this actually changes my overall opinion of the film. Much like the discussions about redemption, the ideas about transitioning from work life and such feel somewhat underdeveloped. But, and maybe it's just because I'm so far removed from school and all the interpretation business that entails, I found it interesting to suddenly discover these ideas I totally missed the first time.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <img> <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options